
Morningside’s Antuan Bloom scores a touchdown. Above is the full-frame version of the photo, below is how I cropped it for the newspaper.

Today I was at the Morningside College football game and a student photographer asked me if I cropped my photos. Yes, I do.
I try to shoot as tight as possible to get the best technical quality from the images. But sports can be unpredictable. I’ll try to shoot a lot of tight shots, such as this full-frame shot from last weeks Briar Cliff football game.

For the newspaper, I shaved a little off the left and a little off the bottom (you can see the cropped version in an earlier post.) But I do wish I had a little more of the ball carriers helmet in the frame.
I’ll hear some photographers say you need to be shooting football with at least a 400mm lens and you should only be shooting from the waist up, you don’t need the legs. That produces a tight, clean shot that really jumps off the page.
But sometimes I think about the words of wisdom from my college mentor Charlie Schlosser. One time I showed Charlie a football pic I took at an Iowa State game and I was so proud of how tight and sharp it was. Charlie told me that yes, it’s was nice shot and it takes a lot of skill to shoot this tight, (this was back in the manual focus days when the photographer had to do the focusing, not the camera.) Then Charlie asked, “But what does it say about the game.”
When I look back at some of my all-time favorite photos, they’re usually not the ones shot super-tight from the waist up. They show unpredictable action with the arms and legs flying all over the place. And sometimes you have to shoot a bit looser to get that action.
I have more control over non-action photos, so I usually need to crop less, but I still do some cropping. I know there are purists out there who believe you should never crop a photo, and that you should crop when you shoot. I do believe that when possible you should crop when you shoot, But that doesn’t mean you can’t crop more later.
Most digital SLR cameras produce an image with a 2:3 aspect ratio, the same as 35mm film. I don’t believe there is anything magical about the 2:3 ratio. Large format cameras produce an image with a 4:5 ratio, and some medium format cameras produce square negatives (1:1 ratio.) There’s nothing magical to me about any of those formats. I crop the image to a shape the best suits the subject, not to some format that was designed a century ago. If an image looks best cropped 2 inches by 10 inches, that’s how I’ll crop it.

A photo I shot today at Art in the Park. At left is the full-frame version, and right is how I cropped it.