
KPTH’s Jackie makes Miranda Bok smile during the RiverCade smile contest at Dairy Queen on Floyd Blvd Sunday, July 13, 2008. (Jim Lee/Sioux City Journal)
The other day a gal came up to me I told me that I did a great job on those photos. I thanked her even though I had no idea which photos she was talking about. Then she asked if I was the one who combined the photos or if someone else did that.
Combine the photos? I thought she probably meant who did the page layout and I told her that the copy editors do that. She told me “It was so neat the way the one photo was put on top of the other.” Huh? OK, she had me stumped, so I finally asked her which photos she was talking about.”The smile contest. The photos of the little girl with Jackie.”
I explained that it was not two photos combined, but that was the way the photo was shot. It was taken with a 70-200mm lens, and the longer lens compressed the image and the shallow depth of field put the focus on the girl.
Nowadays most people have heard of PhotoShop and realize how easy it is to manipulate images, and it scares me that some people automatically assume that my images have been manipulated. Most news photographers, including myself and my coworkers, follow pretty strict ethical guidelines when it comes working with our images. We will crop our photos, color correct them, lighten or darken them as needed so they will reproduce better in the paper. But we will not do anything that alters the content of the image. (There are exceptions for photo illustrations, but they will always be clearly marked as illustrations.)
I know there are a few bad apples out there in our industry who will alter their photos, but most of us strive to produce good photos that are truthful and accurate.