Imagine my surprise this morning during the hourlong Woodbury County Board of Supervisors meeting with seven agenda items. During a discussion on county workers moving to a new payroll documentation system, at 10:23 a.m., the door swung open and Doug Gross walked in. Yes, Doug Gross — Des Moines attorney, the 2002 Republican gubernatorial candidate and former key official during Terry Branstad years as governor. He was present to talk on behalf of the city of Salix, since an Interstate 29 interchange could be moved by the Iowa Department of Transportation.
After the meeting, Gross, who isn’t beloved by social conservatives for his push to widen the GOP tent, agreed to talk 2010 gubernatorial politics. It made me think back to October 2002 when, in one of my first duties at The Journal, I was on a three-person panel querying Gross and Gov. Tom Vilsack in a debate set in Sioux City.
Q: Do you fully back Branstad entering the race?
Gross: “I worked for him, I was his chief of staff, so if Terry Branstad wants to get into the race, I’m fully supportive. Now, I have done some (2009) analysis and looked at the race, and in head-to-head competition he is the only one that beats (Gov. Chet) Culver, and he beats him like a drum. So obviously he would be the strongest candidate, if he decides to run.”
Q: So what are you doing to push (Branstad) toward the race?
Gross: “I’m not trying to push him toward it at all. From a personal standpoint, I’ve not been the one saying, ‘Hey, you need to do this,’ because he’s a good friend of mine, he’s got a great job (as Des Moines University president) and I don’t think he owes us anything. But that doesn’t mean he won’t do it, because Terry Branstad is driven by his commitment to the state and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he decides he wants to do it. If he does, I’m going to be 100 percent behind him.”
Q: So Sandy (Greiner) formed the Draft Branstad PAC and you’re not a part of that organization whatsoever?
Gross: “No, I am not. I did the Iowa First Foundation, where we did a lot of the analysis about, OK, what is the lay of the land, what do Republicans need to do to get back in control. It is pretty clear (Branstad) would be our best candidate, I mean from a political standpoint. But I divorce that from the personal matter, where he is a good friend of mine and I’ve not taken a position of urging him to run.”
Q: To state that, where do Republicans need to go to in order to be good in 2010 in elective office?
Gross: “To win? First of all, the issue environment should be such that it will be a great Republican year. It is the midterm for as Democrat incumbent president, the voters are really focused on economic issues that are important for Republicans — jobs, economic development, the fiscal issues, taxes and government spending — those are all issues that are all right in the Republicans’ wheelhouse. The key is having candidates who can appeal to the public on those kinds of issues. And my concern — I’ve been pretty outspoken about this — is that it is fine for us to be socially conservative — I happen to be (socially conservative) myself, in terms of those issues — but those are not the issues we should lead with. We should lead on the economic issues, because those are the ones we can win with.” (more…)