Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Carroll committee to review banned book

8:15 AM

Posted: Friday, December 01, 2006
CARROLL, Iowa (AP) -- School officials say a committee will review whether "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" will remain banned from the curriculum in the Carroll Community School District.

Superintendent Rob Cordes removed the book last week after parents complained that its sexual content was inappropriate for students.

"What's Eating Gilbert Grape" was written by Peter Hedges, an Iowan, and has been taught in Carroll High School's literature-to-film class for several years.

Per school board policy, a committee must be formed to read the book and decide whether Cordes' decision will stand, says school board President Laurie Kasperbauer.

The 1991 book deals with a young man's experiences with his troubled family in a small Iowa town. Cordes and the parents who called for the ban -- Kerry and Valerie Hucka -- say they have not read the book.

"We would not want to fill our minds with such garbage," the Huckas wrote in a letter to the district.

"It promotes immorality, adultery, fornication and self-indulgence."

The committee charged with reading the book will be comprised of district faculty, students and community members. No timetable has been set for a decision.

Carroll High School teacher-librarian Kelly Fischbach says the book deserves to be judged in its entirety, not for a few sentences. She calls it a 'great book' that connects with rural Iowa teens.

Students have started an Internet protest of Cordes' decision on the social network Facebook. Nearly 250 people have joined "Un-ban Gilbert Grape! Censorship Is Wrong."

Cordes says the issue is a matter of curriculum, not a matter of censorship. The book is still available at the school's library and many students have bought copies for themselves.

Meanwhile, the Huckas are pushing for more change. They say the district should consider removing more books and replace them with more appropriate material -- both in the classroom and the library.

"Our daughter has to change classes next semester now because even though this book is removed as curriculum, the other books being taught are not appropriate either," the Huckas wrote.

"If these types of books are going to continue to be used for curriculum and be in the school library, maybe we should consider a school that actually promotes morality, integrity and character instead of sexual perversion and promiscuity."

Information from: Daily Times Herald

AP-CS-12-01-06 0103EST

Previous Next
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

AT wrote on Jan 7, 2007 11:35 AM:

" I'm a sophomore in high school and I was researching information for a paragraph on bannned and challenged books when I came across this article. I'd like to know how the Hucka's daughter feels about the whole situation. The girl is in highschool, after all, and she has doubtlessly already read, watched, heard about, talked about, or even done things her parents would consider "inappropriate" and showing no "morality, integrity, or character". If the Hucka's never want their daughter to grow up and understand what goes on in the world, then I guess they are doing the right thing. "

MB wrote on Dec 1, 2006 4:48 PM:

" Steve, I went to a Catholic school. And I've seen much worse things happen than someone * gasp * reading a book. Instead of letting your children experience life and have an open mind, you'd rather shield them from life because talking about intercourse, bigotry and violence makes you uncomfortable. And these kids are going to grow up not knowing how to deal with these situations. So instead of banning this book from your children, how about letting them read it if they want to, then having a discussion with them about why you think the topics of the book are bad. You can't just say, "This is bad. Don't do it." You need to explain WHY adultery is bad, and WHY it hurts people. Children can't grow up without an explanation for something. If you don't provide them with an explanation, they're going to try and find it for themselves, because parents aren't taking the time to listen to them, or to answer their questions. "

NRT wrote on Dec 1, 2006 4:31 PM:

" While I appreciate the apparent sincerity of the Hucka Family, in my opinion it's hypocritical to demand that a book be banned without reading it first. I remember the Harry Potter hysteria amongst certain conservative members of our American population a few years ago. In several places you had scenes reminiscent of a Nazi rally - book burnings with people, who had NEVER read the book, judging it based on hearsay and outright lies about the content of the series and the author. This rush to judgement before truly and rationally appraising something makes these people no better than some of the more fundamentalist members of Middle Eastern society. I live in America and I still have my First Amendment right to free speech - please don't tread on that, Mr. and Mrs. Hucka. "

Kim wrote on Dec 1, 2006 2:33 PM:

" There are plenty of other books to read. I would hope there are some that are positive influences to children so they can grow up and make the world a better place and not grow up confused and opposing themselves. "

Rob wrote on Dec 1, 2006 1:13 PM:

" Big surprise, the parents who want the back banned nor the superintendent have even read it. Talk about your knee-jerk reactions. I can guarantee one thing, more people will read this book than would have otherwise. "

Read More and Post Comments 8 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
81°
Sat
82°/61°
Sun
86°/62°

Events Calendar

Other Publications