Iowa Democrats to consider 'fair share' laws
By Charlotte Eby, Journal Des Moines Bureau | Posted: Wednesday, December 06, 2006
DES MOINES -- Gov.nelect Chet Culver and Democratic leaders in the Iowa Legislature said Tuesday they will consider "fair share" laws that require non-union employees to pay for benefits they enjoy through organized labor.
"I think we need to have a debate and a discussion on that important issue and many others," Culver said
Democrats argue that unions currently are forced to represent non-union employees in contract negotiations and disputes with management, even when those employees aren't paying union dues.
Incoming Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal of Council Bluffs likened the current situation to the friend who always seems to be in the bathroom when it is his turn to pay for the next pitcher of beer.
"Now that's just wrong," Gronstal said at a forum sponsored by The Associated Press.
Gronstal sparred with Republican House Speaker Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City, over the issue Tuesday.
Rants said Republicans are nervous the proposal would require businesses to collect what amounts to union dues. Iowa's so-called Right to Work law prohibits forced union membership.
"If you're going to force people who don't belong to a union to pay some sort of substitute for union dues, that is an attack on Iowa's Right to Work law," Rants said.
Incoming House Speaker Pat Murphy, D-Dubuque, said the fair share law would not mean repealing the right to work law.
"I think that's the big problem is some people don't understand the difference," Murphy said.
Iowa Federation of Labor President Mark Smith estimates 130,000 Iowa workers, including teachers, are union members. He said he doesn't know exactly how many employees are not members of a union but still enjoy the wage levels and benefits negotiated by organized labor.
"There isn't any other business relationship that exists in society where somebody gets something for nothing, with this exception," Smith said.
Charlotte Eby can be reached at (515) 243-0138 or chareby@aol.com.
"I think we need to have a debate and a discussion on that important issue and many others," Culver said
Democrats argue that unions currently are forced to represent non-union employees in contract negotiations and disputes with management, even when those employees aren't paying union dues.
Incoming Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal of Council Bluffs likened the current situation to the friend who always seems to be in the bathroom when it is his turn to pay for the next pitcher of beer.
"Now that's just wrong," Gronstal said at a forum sponsored by The Associated Press.
Gronstal sparred with Republican House Speaker Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City, over the issue Tuesday.
Rants said Republicans are nervous the proposal would require businesses to collect what amounts to union dues. Iowa's so-called Right to Work law prohibits forced union membership.
"If you're going to force people who don't belong to a union to pay some sort of substitute for union dues, that is an attack on Iowa's Right to Work law," Rants said.
Incoming House Speaker Pat Murphy, D-Dubuque, said the fair share law would not mean repealing the right to work law.
"I think that's the big problem is some people don't understand the difference," Murphy said.
Iowa Federation of Labor President Mark Smith estimates 130,000 Iowa workers, including teachers, are union members. He said he doesn't know exactly how many employees are not members of a union but still enjoy the wage levels and benefits negotiated by organized labor.
"There isn't any other business relationship that exists in society where somebody gets something for nothing, with this exception," Smith said.
Charlotte Eby can be reached at (515) 243-0138 or chareby@aol.com.
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 11 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service















teamsters blues wrote on Apr 23, 2007 8:35 AM:
teamsters blues wrote on Apr 23, 2007 8:29 AM:
freeloader wrote on Apr 5, 2007 10:25 PM:
freeloader wrote on Apr 5, 2007 10:16 PM:
Skip wrote on Jan 14, 2007 1:09 PM: