No voice
Posted: Friday, March 30, 2007
In an Aug. 31 editorial during last year's Iowa gubernatorial campaign, we criticized candidate Chet Culver for not wanting to include Sioux City as one of the sites for a debate with his opponent, Jim Nussle. Three months later, we editorialized about our concerns that Northwest Iowa's clout would diminish in the wake of November's elections, including Culver's victory.
Well, Culver's recent nominations of four new members to the Iowa Board of Regents provides further evidence of a disturbing trend of disrespect in Des Moines where this side of the state is concerned.
None of Culver's nominees live in western Iowa. If his appointments are confirmed by the Senate, the nine-member board will have no western Iowa representation whatsoever. Des Moines, however, will be strongly represented, with no less than five members living in or near the capital city.
Supporters of Culver's election bid will be well represented, too. According to a copyright story in The Des Moines Register, nominees Bonnie Campbell and David Miles, and their spouses, gave more than $62,000 to Culver's campaign. If the amount of contributions made to his gubernatorial campaign drove Culver's Regent appointments, then it isn't surprising that western Iowa wasn't represented. Of the 37 counties carried by Nussle, 26 of them were located west of Interstate 35. Culver carried only one of 15 counties in Northwest Iowa.
Culver's new nominees are not without qualifications. Each is an accomplished Iowan. Still, that's beside the point. Western Iowa offers a wealth of talented individuals who could be considered for the board, as well.
It's simply not right for the interests and views of taxpayers whose dollars support public higher education in the state - just like the dollars of taxpayers in Des Moines, West Des Moines and Cedar Rapids - to have no voice on this important, high-profile board.
It isn't the Eastern Two Thirds of Iowa Board of Regents, it's the Iowa Board of Regents. All geographic sections of the state should have a presence.
Well, Culver's recent nominations of four new members to the Iowa Board of Regents provides further evidence of a disturbing trend of disrespect in Des Moines where this side of the state is concerned.
None of Culver's nominees live in western Iowa. If his appointments are confirmed by the Senate, the nine-member board will have no western Iowa representation whatsoever. Des Moines, however, will be strongly represented, with no less than five members living in or near the capital city.
Supporters of Culver's election bid will be well represented, too. According to a copyright story in The Des Moines Register, nominees Bonnie Campbell and David Miles, and their spouses, gave more than $62,000 to Culver's campaign. If the amount of contributions made to his gubernatorial campaign drove Culver's Regent appointments, then it isn't surprising that western Iowa wasn't represented. Of the 37 counties carried by Nussle, 26 of them were located west of Interstate 35. Culver carried only one of 15 counties in Northwest Iowa.
Culver's new nominees are not without qualifications. Each is an accomplished Iowan. Still, that's beside the point. Western Iowa offers a wealth of talented individuals who could be considered for the board, as well.
It's simply not right for the interests and views of taxpayers whose dollars support public higher education in the state - just like the dollars of taxpayers in Des Moines, West Des Moines and Cedar Rapids - to have no voice on this important, high-profile board.
It isn't the Eastern Two Thirds of Iowa Board of Regents, it's the Iowa Board of Regents. All geographic sections of the state should have a presence.
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 8 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service














CB wrote on Apr 2, 2007 2:58 PM:
CB wrote on Apr 1, 2007 12:47 AM:
Silvanus wrote on Mar 30, 2007 6:45 PM:
Keith wrote on Mar 30, 2007 3:46 PM:
TB wrote on Mar 30, 2007 3:00 PM: