A reminder for Pelosi
Posted: Thursday, April 05, 2007
Someone needs to remind Nancy Pelosi that she's speaker of the U.S. House, not president of the U.S.
The way Pelosi talks and acts, we sometimes wonder whether she's confused about her position and role. Democrats won control of both legislative branches of the federal government in November, not the executive branch. Pelosi isn't the commander-in-chief and she isn't in charge of American foreign policy. Whether she likes it or not, those duties and responsibilities belong to George W. Bush for another 21 months.
Still, there was Pelosi on Tuesday and Wednesday, thumbing her nose at the Bush administration from the streets of Damascus, Syria. Despite being asked by the White House not to travel to Syria, Pelosi - America's self-appointed Middle East ambassador - went, even meeting with Syria's president, Bashar Assad, on Wednesday.
The president and his administration make foreign policy for this country. Debate about those policies back home in the halls of Congress is wholly appropriate.
However, when an administration - any administration - believes it counterproductive to its policies for a high-ranking official of our government to visit a foreign nation with which we are at odds and goes so far as to ask that the official stay home, then that official should respect and listen to that. In no part of the world is it more important to carefully consider the dangers inherent in delivering mixed, perhaps conflicting American signals than in the volatile Middle East.
If, say, Newt Gingrich had ignored a request from President Clinton to not visit Yugoslavia and instead had traveled there, even going so far as to meet with its president, Slobodan Milosevic, while he was speaker, what would Pelosi's position have been? She would have been outraged, of course - and justifiably so.
However, when you are suffering from the delusion that you are, in fact, the president, as Pelosi appears to be, apparently you can justify that kind of hypocrisy in your mind.
The way Pelosi talks and acts, we sometimes wonder whether she's confused about her position and role. Democrats won control of both legislative branches of the federal government in November, not the executive branch. Pelosi isn't the commander-in-chief and she isn't in charge of American foreign policy. Whether she likes it or not, those duties and responsibilities belong to George W. Bush for another 21 months.
Still, there was Pelosi on Tuesday and Wednesday, thumbing her nose at the Bush administration from the streets of Damascus, Syria. Despite being asked by the White House not to travel to Syria, Pelosi - America's self-appointed Middle East ambassador - went, even meeting with Syria's president, Bashar Assad, on Wednesday.
The president and his administration make foreign policy for this country. Debate about those policies back home in the halls of Congress is wholly appropriate.
However, when an administration - any administration - believes it counterproductive to its policies for a high-ranking official of our government to visit a foreign nation with which we are at odds and goes so far as to ask that the official stay home, then that official should respect and listen to that. In no part of the world is it more important to carefully consider the dangers inherent in delivering mixed, perhaps conflicting American signals than in the volatile Middle East.
If, say, Newt Gingrich had ignored a request from President Clinton to not visit Yugoslavia and instead had traveled there, even going so far as to meet with its president, Slobodan Milosevic, while he was speaker, what would Pelosi's position have been? She would have been outraged, of course - and justifiably so.
However, when you are suffering from the delusion that you are, in fact, the president, as Pelosi appears to be, apparently you can justify that kind of hypocrisy in your mind.
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 96 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service














H Finder wrote on Aug 14, 2008 5:24 PM:
artis wrote on Nov 5, 2007 1:56 PM:
Craig wrote on Apr 17, 2007 9:54 AM:
Keith P wrote on Apr 17, 2007 9:52 AM:
Randy wrote on Apr 17, 2007 7:38 AM: