Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Hyperion wants options on more land

Texas company has options on 10,000 acres in Union County

By Michele Linck Journal staff writer | Posted: Friday, August 17, 2007
Joyce Bortscheller said Thursday that her Wednesday-evening picnic for Albert Huddleston, CEO of Hyperion Resources, and about 85 Union County landowners who have sold options on their land to the Dallas oilman was simply a social occasion.

Huddleston did welcome everyone, Bortscheller said, but after that he only visited one on one with guests. "There weren't any business transactions or anything like that," the hostess said. "It was just for them to get to know him."

Hyperion announced June 13 that it was the mystery company behind the purchase of options to buy thousands of acres of farmland in Union County on which it is considering building a high-tech oil refinery --Hyperion Energy Center -- that would have a 2,000-acre footprint and need about 3,000 acres as a buffer. The company said it is considering at least one other site in the Midwest.

Ron Bird, one of the earliest landowners to option his family's farmland to the then-unidentified buyer and project, was among the picnic guests Wednesday who visited with Huddleston over hamburgers, brats, sweet corn, salads and desserts.

"Mr. Huddleston said they have 10,000 acres (optioned) but want to accumulate more for buffers," Bird said in a phone interview Thursday.

Bird also said that Richard E. White told him the company will be opening an office in downtown Elk Point soon. White, a retired Marathon Oil executive, signed the land-option contracts filed with the Union County Register of Deeds as agent for Elk Point Economic Development Corp.

Bird said members of that corporation's board also were at the picnic, including Bruce Odsen, Dawn Glover and Bortscheller -- who is also the president of the Elk Point City Council -- as well as Kim McLaury, whose Elk Point firm, McLaury Engineering, is already working with Hyperion on the project. Bird said Richard Benda, secretary of South Dakota Tourism and State Development, also attended.

Like Bortscheller, Bird described Huddleston as " a very down-to-earth, sincere person, a real gentleman."

He said he spoke with Huddleston personally and that anyone at the picnic who wanted to speak to him had the opportunity. Bird said even before meeting Huddleston, he never had reservations about the decision to sell options on his land.

"I really believe this is going to be a refinery that will stand tall against the others," Bird said. "It's going to be the most modern in the world."

In the mail ...

The picnic coincided with the arrival in area mailboxes Wednesday of a brochure about the proposed oil refinery. The brochure promises the company would use the most cutting-edge, environmentally friendly technology and would communicate closely with the community.

Bortscheller said Huddleston had to leave the area sooner than he'd planned but said he'll be back, probably in the next few weeks.

"I think he doesn't want to make any kind of commitments until he's sure he can get the proper permits," Bortscheller said of the company's continuing position that Union County is only one possible site.

Bortscheller said the council wants to be prepared if Union County is, in fact, the site. The project would be outside the Elk Point city limits.

"There is going to be some growth happening," she said. "We want to address that as soon as possible as far as utilities, police. We want to make sure our ordinances are current."

'Gorilla'

Huddleston's company first had contact with the landowners through three area real estate agents who convinced a number of them to sell options on their land to a company whose identity the Realtors told landowners they did not know. The associated project, also unidentified, became known as "Gorilla."

So far, all of the land options filed in the county Register of Deeds Office are to expire at the end of this month but with three renewal options of one year each. They total slightly more than 2,000 acres, despite Wednesday's revelation that Hyperion has options on 10,000 acres. South Dakota does not require that land-option sales be registered.

Previous
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

up on the bench wrote on Aug 18, 2007 9:41 AM:

" if Hyperion in fact has the land, they don't have the oil...join forces with Yankton. NO PIPELINE, NO REFINERY! "

Denny Larson wrote on Aug 18, 2007 8:21 AM:

" Hyperion's mailer and website fail to provide any of the deatils needed to analyze the true impact of the proposed refinery complex. Unlike the Save Union County group, Hyperion does not hold public meetings, instead they hide behind hype and meet in private. What does Hyperion have to hide? Perhaps, it's the truth? "

Leaving union county wrote on Aug 17, 2007 8:54 PM:

" Let's see ... higher property taxes, more crime, more pollution, more money for big oil. Whose cup will be half full? Bortscheller has land along I-29 and she is supporting this because she is hoping that it will make her rich. What will her friends and neighbors think when their property taxes double to pay for all of the infrastructure that will be needed - schools, jails, fire and police, etc? "

John wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:35 PM:

" No Tex - glass is half full because this may not come here. South Dakota allows the highest interest in the nation on credit cards to get banks to come here, high enough to be considered loan sharks. We already legalized gambling and number running to avoid income tax, maybe we could legalize and tax crack and brothel houses to, why leave out any vice we can make money with if money is all that matters. South Dakota is behind the times courting an industry that will decline as the next federal administration along with the EU tackles global warming. As if a real cowboy would consider working for a credit card company. Fluff PR will not change majority voters minds here. One other reason they may want so much ground, it allows more credit for waste emissions into the enviroment. How about a glass full of dioxin anyone? "

sad sad times wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:14 PM:

" I can't tell you that I am 100% against this--but so many in favor of this think that if we do have some opposition we are "closed minded & don't want progress". that is so far from true. we would greatly appreciate positive progress. bring on Gateway or something similar. An oil refinery. Hello we are trying to avoid dependancy on foreign oil. this would be a step backwards in my eyes. "

Read More and Post Comments 10 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
82°
Sat
79°/61°
Sun
84°/61°

Events Calendar

Other Publications