March draws attention to foster care issues
By Travis Coleman Journal Staff Writer | Posted: Thursday, November 22, 2007
SOUTH SIOUX CITY -- For the fifth time, Ida Tuttle carried a picture of her then 11-month old nephew, Kristopher, for the annual March and Rally for Our Lost Children Wednesday.
The memory of her nephew helped Tuttle cross the Veteran's Bridge here despite the day's 20 mph winds. Carrying Kristopher's picture helped Tuttle's family find him after pictures of a previous march were published. Kristopher, now 6, lives in Tama, Iowa with a foster family.
"But he is always with us," Tuttle said.
Tuttle was one of more than 125 American Indians that marched to draw attention to what they called the continued overrepresentation of Indian children in foster care. Marchers also remembered the Indian children who have died while in foster care.
Each marcher carried a sign with a different message. Co-coordinator Frank LaMere's sign read, "Sioux City, you're beginning to make us mad."
"The support for our efforts runs deep in this community," LaMere said.
Despite some recent success, the number of area Indian children in foster care remains disproportionate, LaMere said. For example, Indian children represent around 2 percent of the child population in Woodbury County, but make up around 15 percent of children in foster care.
According to a report released Monday, Nebraska and South Dakota are the fifth- and eighth-worst states in terms of the disproportionate number of Indian children in foster care. The report was published by the National Indian Child Welfare Association and the Kids Are Waiting campaign of the Pew Charitable Trusts. The report called for tribes to have more access to federal dollars that help Indian children needing foster care, which they don’t always get.
Wednesday's group admonished local Court Appointed Special Advocates and Guardians Ad Litem programs, saying they don't work for Indian children. After marching from the Marina Inn to downtown Sioux City, they said these programs need to follow cultural competency and active effort tabs found in the Indian Child Welfare Act laws.
"We challenge Woodbury County to get in line with the (IWCA) instead of against it," LaMere said.
When Indian children are taken from their families and not returned, it disrupts their identity development, said Sandy White Hawk of the St. Paul-based First Nations Orphan Association.
State Sen. Steve Warnstadt of Sioux City said although "there's still a lot of injustice," local voices are being heard. Gov. Chet Culver wrote a letter to LaMere dated Monday that said Iowa's policy is that Indian foster children be kept in their communities and connected to their culture.
"It is through actions such as this march that important issues are brought to the public attention and progress is made," Culver wrote.
Along with holding others accountable, LaMere told residents to hold each other responsible for actions that could result in their children being taken from them or other problems.
"Let us chide one another. That's how it used to be," LaMere said.
The memory of her nephew helped Tuttle cross the Veteran's Bridge here despite the day's 20 mph winds. Carrying Kristopher's picture helped Tuttle's family find him after pictures of a previous march were published. Kristopher, now 6, lives in Tama, Iowa with a foster family.
"But he is always with us," Tuttle said.
Tuttle was one of more than 125 American Indians that marched to draw attention to what they called the continued overrepresentation of Indian children in foster care. Marchers also remembered the Indian children who have died while in foster care.
Each marcher carried a sign with a different message. Co-coordinator Frank LaMere's sign read, "Sioux City, you're beginning to make us mad."
"The support for our efforts runs deep in this community," LaMere said.
Despite some recent success, the number of area Indian children in foster care remains disproportionate, LaMere said. For example, Indian children represent around 2 percent of the child population in Woodbury County, but make up around 15 percent of children in foster care.
According to a report released Monday, Nebraska and South Dakota are the fifth- and eighth-worst states in terms of the disproportionate number of Indian children in foster care. The report was published by the National Indian Child Welfare Association and the Kids Are Waiting campaign of the Pew Charitable Trusts. The report called for tribes to have more access to federal dollars that help Indian children needing foster care, which they don’t always get.
Wednesday's group admonished local Court Appointed Special Advocates and Guardians Ad Litem programs, saying they don't work for Indian children. After marching from the Marina Inn to downtown Sioux City, they said these programs need to follow cultural competency and active effort tabs found in the Indian Child Welfare Act laws.
"We challenge Woodbury County to get in line with the (IWCA) instead of against it," LaMere said.
When Indian children are taken from their families and not returned, it disrupts their identity development, said Sandy White Hawk of the St. Paul-based First Nations Orphan Association.
State Sen. Steve Warnstadt of Sioux City said although "there's still a lot of injustice," local voices are being heard. Gov. Chet Culver wrote a letter to LaMere dated Monday that said Iowa's policy is that Indian foster children be kept in their communities and connected to their culture.
"It is through actions such as this march that important issues are brought to the public attention and progress is made," Culver wrote.
Along with holding others accountable, LaMere told residents to hold each other responsible for actions that could result in their children being taken from them or other problems.
"Let us chide one another. That's how it used to be," LaMere said.
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 6 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service
















vanida wrote on Nov 23, 2007 11:38 AM:
"lot of injustice"?? wrote on Nov 22, 2007 10:03 PM:
sheila wrote on Nov 22, 2007 9:55 PM:
John2 in Morningside wrote on Nov 22, 2007 3:28 PM:
John in Morningside wrote on Nov 22, 2007 3:22 PM: