Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Union County residents crowd Hyperion forum

They ask questions of the experts

By Michele Linck Journal staff writer | Posted: Tuesday, December 11, 2007
BERESFORD, S.D. -- Union County residents got a chance Monday to ask questions of Hyperion Resources officials and environmental experts about the company's proposed oil refinery/energy center that it may build in their midst.

People began arriving at Beresford Community Center well ahead of the forum's scheduled 6 p.m. start. By 7 p.m. more than 200 had signed in.

Nine tables holding displays of specific facets of the project, ranging from an overview of Dallas-based Hyperion to the project's impact on air and water, its technology, labor shed and estimated economic impact on the area were spread around the community center. Each table was staffed by at least one company expert who has worked on the $10 billion Hyperion Energy Center.

Hyperion filed an application last week for the rezoning of 3,882 acres for the center, which would be anchored by a 400,000-barrel-per-day oil refinery and also produce some of its own electricity.

Hyperion maintains it is also considering other sites but hasn't publicly identified any.

'Amazing' aerial photo

A display of an aerial photo with a simulated refinery imposed on the actual site caught the attention of many landowners. It alone answered many questions.

Reed Bird, who farms some land within the refinery's proposed footprint, studied the fields and pointed to his home, just outside the boundary. He said he has sold an option on his house to Hyperion.

"It's kind of amazing to see the hills in the background," his mother, Maxine Bird, marveled. She and her husband, Ron Bird, have optioned much of their land to the company.

'It's a concern'

Jim Wennblom came from Elk Point, S.D. to ask his only question. "I'm an amateur radio operator, interested to see if they'll be causing any RF (radio frequency) noise," he said. He hadn't yet found the table at which to ask it, however.

Krishna Mastel of Vermillion, who said she holds degrees in biology and law, came to ask environmental questions. She said she was disappointed the answers weren't more specific.

She said the Hyperion representative she'd talked to about carbon dioxide emissions, which are currently unregulated, told her the company would support new standards as long as they are applied to everyone. "They're not going to lobby for it," she said.

"They're here saying they'll use the best control technology," Mastel said. "It's because they have to. It's the law."

For Stan Foltz of Vermillion, the questions were personal, although he hadn't yet asked them. An employee of Union County Electric Co-op, he wondered whether Hyperion was going to make all its own electricity and if not, from what other company would it buy power?

"They're taking a lot of our territory," he said. "It's a concern. That's where I draw my paycheck."

Marcella Buum said she lives six miles northwest of the proposed refinery site. She asked Hyperion's refinery/power plant air permitting expert, Tom Emmel, if she would smell the refinery.

He told her the sulfur byproduct is the worst smelling but that it would be in closed containers on rail cars inside a building.

"If that's true, it makes me happy," Buum said. "I'd like to have him sign on the dotted line."

Among Emmel's graphs was one that shows the refinery would emit fewer than 2,500 tons of air pollutants a year, 1/30 that of the George Neal plant at MidAmerican Energy's Port Neal facility near Sergeant Bluff, and 1/60 that of the Big Stone power plant near Milbank, S.D.

Emmel said Hyperion would apply for its air permits soon. He estimated they would take about one year to obtain.

Outspoken proponents and opponents of the facility were also at the informal forum.

J.B. Mercer, head of Citizens for Hyperion, said that within the first hour he had gotten a dozen or so new names for the committee's e-mail list, bringing it to about 100, including some opponents.

Dale Harkness, leader of the opposition Save Union County group, said he had been busy visiting with acquaintances but would ask just one question: "Why would they ask the taxpayers of Union County to throw away the handbook they've gone under for 11 years?"

The handbook describes how to go about asking for rezoning, and, Harkness said, it states on Page 29 that agricultural land shall remain agricultural.

The refinery, as finally sited, would lie across the street from Harkness' driveway.

Several top Hyperion executives were on hand, as well, including project executives Preston Phillips and Corky Frank, retired president of Marathon Ashland Petroleum.

Frank said engineering for the project is still in progress and is very complex; it must be specific to the site, its land configurations and wind currents and meet other criteria.

Asked about the four pipelines needed to serve the refinery, Frank said the pipeline companies aren't interested in talking "until you have something firm." After that, rights of way and other logistics are the responsibility of the pipeline company.

BREAKOUT
Hyperion resources will host two more public forums on its proposed Hyperion Energy Center.
Today, 6 to 10 p.m., Dakota Valley Elementary School, 80 Northshore Drive, North Sioux City.
Wednesday, 6 to 10 p.m., Elk Point Jefferson High School, 402 Douglas St. Elk Point, S.D.
Previous Next
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

SiouxFallsBusinessMan wrote on Jun 4, 2008 5:06 PM:

" Union County has voted yes for Hyperion!!! What disgusts me is that all of these ignorant people who are still going to fight Hyperion. What makes you so high and mighty? What makes you think that your vote is more important than the 3900+ voters who voted yes for Hyperion. You got what you wanted, a public vote in which you LOST. So stop being sore losers (ED CABLE I'm TALKING TO YOU) it's over. Respect your fellow citizen and stop whining. You are lucky the entire state didn't get to vote on it, it would still be a YES vote. It is amazing that someone would vote "no" on something that has so many benefits that come with it. So many great paying jobs that don't require so much Federal help like um.... FARMERS! Oh and all of the tax money that goes to the school district why would you vote no? Hyperion is going to be the one of the cleanest greenest refinery ever made, before you start whining about refinery pollution you need to take a look at your cow farms and how much green house gas they produce.
Sincerely,
An Educated Citizen "

Billboard wrote on Jan 2, 2008 9:58 AM:

" Actually,
We should start with some of you
giving back Food Stamp money and
then getting an education and life
beyond knocking the Farm Families
that fed your fat faces. "

How about another bailout for your "Century Farm"? wrote on Dec 26, 2007 3:26 PM:

" How many times has the US consumer bailed out the farmer? We may not have bailed you out personally, but I would like to see how much Fed "welfare" farm bill money is getting pumped into Union County every year. How many more times will we continue to see bloated farm bills doling out money to farmers for everything from planting to not planting? How about all the "greedy" farmers raking it in now for the price of their corn? We better ask them to give some of it back.

Hey, my ancestors came from Ireland during the potato famine. I wonder if I can go back there and ask for my family farm back? "

Union2 wrote on Dec 19, 2007 11:09 PM:

" Loss is a part of life. In every area of our lives we try to minimize senseless loss. The things I've heard from so many people supporting the refinery indicate there is not a good understanding of the loss that will occur. It's easy to support this -- until you put a face on the loss. If the refinery is built, I will have lost. At that point, I will commit to work hard to see them succeed -- environmentally, financially. I will hope the jobs come, the environment stays clean, the county prospers. I will do this because this place is important beyond my little portion of it and it would be a bigger, more senseless loss if it started then failed. It still isn't the right thing. There is too much risk (environmentally) -- too much that could go wrong that could not be recovered if something goes bad. It isn't reversible. We'd better be sure. Very, very sure. "

FNG wrote on Dec 15, 2007 11:56 AM:

" To Hey Loopy who says "If you have no opportunities without a refinery, you will certainly have no opportunity with a refinery. As business owners who can afford to leave take their jobs with them..." Why would business owners leave with all of the people and economic activity increasing? Most business owners would be foolish to leave, your statement isn't logical. "

Read More and Post Comments 39 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
75°
Sun
84°/63°
Mon
86°/64°

Events Calendar

Other Publications