Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Judge to review DNA evidence against Jeff Boppre

Posted: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
SCOTTSBLUFF, Neb. (AP) -- A district court judge has ordered a hearing to review new DNA tests and other evidence in the 1988 slayings of a Scottsbluff man and his pregnant girlfriend.

Jeff Boppre, who is serving two consecutive life sentences for the 1988 robbery and murders of Richard Valdez and Sharon Condon, filed a motion in 2005 seeking forensic testing of evidence used in the case.

Boppre filed his motions in accordance with a 2005 state law that allows defendants to seek additional DNA tests if it could produce evidence that a person was wrongfully convicted of a crime.

According to court documents, Boppre maintains that two men who testified in the case, Kennard Wasmer and William Alan Niemann, framed him for the murders.

Boppre contends in court documents that Wasmer committed the murders.

He alleges that evidence collected in the case, including a pair of jeans prosecutors have stated are Boppre's, would dispute Wasmer's assertion that he was not at the scene of the murders.

According to court documents, Boppre alleges the jeans were too large to fit him and belonged to Wasmer. Grease on the jeans matched the motor grease at the scene of the murders and blood found on the jeans matched Condon's blood type.

During the April 29 hearing, Scotts Bluff County District Judge Randy Lippstreu will review results of DNA tests conducted on the jeans and blood and tissue samples taken from the murder scene and from Wasmer and Niemann's trailer.

Since his conviction in March 1999, Boppre has made three previous bids to have his case reconsidered, filing a motion for a new trial and two motions for post-conviction release. All three motions were denied and upheld by the Nebraska Supreme Court.

Next
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

Sidney wrote on Apr 4, 2008 9:53 AM:

" I have read the entire court proceedings, personally examined much of the evidence, interviewed the victims' families, and discussed the proceedings with four of the five principal witnesses who testified at Boppre's trial. The accepted "facts" of the case didn't hold up to scrutiny back in 1998 and do not hold up today. Among the most glaring examples of the many contradictions is the writing that victim Richard Valdez was alleged to have written on the floor of the farm house where police found his body. Two world renowned forensic pathologists to whom I showed the Valdez autopsy report both told me that Valdez was dead of gunshot wounds before he collapsed onto the floor. And if he was dead before he fell to the floor he was certainly in no position to write his killer's name with a tube of mechanics grease. Alan Niemann, one of the two witnesses who testified against Boppre, actually recanted his testimony. The "new" blood evidence which has triggered the latest appeal is merely icing on a cake which has been baking for twenty years. It's time to let Boppre out of prison and let him get on with his life. "

Read More and Post Comments 1 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
73°
Mon
85°/63°
Tue
85°/69°

Events Calendar

Other Publications