Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Kansas official: Water dispute with Neb. no closer to solution

Posted: Tuesday, February 05, 2008
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) -- Kansas' top water resources administrator says a letter he received from Nebraska on Monday did nothing to move the states closer to an agreement in their dispute over Republican River Basin water.

Nebraska Department of Resources Director Ann Bleed said in her letter to David Barfield that she disagrees with the methods Kansas used to measure the overuse of water.

Bleed added that Nebraska pledges to do all it can to achieve compliance with the compact at the root of the dispute.

Barfield, chief engineer with the Kansas Department of Agriculture's Division of Water Resources, demanded in a December letter to Bleed that Nebraska shut down irrigation wells within 2.5 miles of the Republican River and its tributaries, plus any wells in the entire basin drilled since 2000. Those wells irrigate some 515,000 acres.

Barfield also is seeking unspecified monetary damages for compact allocation violations in 2005 and 2006.

Water use from the Republican River is governed by a 2003 decree from the U.S. Supreme Court, which approved a settlement among Kansas, Nebraska and Colorado of a lawsuit filed by Kansas in 1998.

Bleed pointed out in her letter that Nebraska sees flaws and limitations in the processes Kansas used for calculating and accounting for water consumption. Those calculations prompted Kansas' demand of the irrigation well shutdown in Nebraska.

"The accounting analysis is based on a dry condition," Bleed wrote, "but the groundwater modeling scenarios used to develop the depletions to the stream due to groundwater pumping is based on a slightly above-average precipitation and streamflow conditions."

She said the result is an inaccurate comparison between the target consumption and the modeling results.

"We knew there were accounting disputes," Barfield said. "Even if you did it Nebraska's way, they would still be about of compliance."

Kansas alleges that Nebraska's water use exceeded what was allowed for 2005-06 by about 27 billion gallons -- or enough to supply a city of 100,000 for 10 years.

Bleed wrote that Kansas' proposed remedy requires Nebraska to restrict its use of streamflow to a significantly larger degree than required by the compact.

"Although Nebraska cannot accept Kansas' proposed remedy, the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources and the Republican River Natural Resources Districts have developed and formally adopted integrated water resources management plans that will enable Nebraska to maintain compliance with the (compact)," Bleed wrote.

She said plans include additional regulations on groundwater use and the implementation of other actions to reduce Nebraska's use to appropriate levels. She said the plan would keep Nebraska in compliance with the compact and reduce the state's use of stream flow in dry years to around the target of 175,000 acre feet that Kansas proposed for a dry condition scenario.

Kansas uses the Republican River to water about 40,000 acres of cropland northwest of Concordia.

Nebraska has about 18,000 irrigation wells in the basin.

Barfield said Kansas would approach the Republican River Compact Administration about the dispute with Nebraska. It's possible the issue will be on the agenda for a March 11-12 compact meeting.

"Kansas wants its water, and we're committed to working through the process to secure that water," Barfield said.

On the Net:

Nebraska Department of Natural Resources: http://www.dnr.ne.gov/

Kansas Division of Water Resources: http://www.ksda.gov/interstate%5Fwater%5Fissues/

Previous
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

Read More and Post Comments 0 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
75°
Sun
84°/63°
Mon
86°/64°

Events Calendar

Other Publications