Refinery opponents sue Union County Commissioners over zoning
Meanwhile, supporters file referendum petitions
By Michele Linck Journal staff writer | Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008
ELK POINT, S.D. -- A citizens group fighting the oil refinery proposed by Hyperion Resources has filed what it calls "a major lawsuit" against the Union County Board of Commissioners.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in Union County Circuit Court, appeals the commissioners' decision to grant Hyperion's application to rezone 3,292 acres of land to accommodate the proposed $10 billion, 400,000-barrel-per-day refinery.
It alleges the commissioners "grossly violated" the law and the county's Comprehensive Plan on March 11 when they approved the ordinance to change the zoning on the refinery site from agricultural to a new class, Energy Center Planned Development District.
Ed Cable, spokesman for the Save Union County Committee, said in a statement, "The county government is acting as though citizens concerned about their actions were invisible, ignoring their protests, refusing to allow public comment and other dictatorial practices."
When informed he and his fellow commissioners had been sued, board Chairman Doyle Karpen{M3 said, "I thought they would have done it sooner. That's their right to do that. I guess they have to move forward with what they think is right."
Supporters file petitions
At nearly the same time the lawsuit was filed, Citizens for Hyperion, a pro-refinery group, filed petitions bearing 952 signatures to bring the zoning matter to a countywide referendum, 20 days ahead of the filing deadline.
"It's exactly double (the number of signatures) needed, and we're still counting," said J.B. Mercer, co-chairman of Citizens for Hyperion. He said a number of petitions are still being circulated.
Mercer said County Auditor Carol Klumper had file stamped all the petitions and has already begun verifying the signatures, hoping to complete that work by Monday. He said he wasn't surprised to learn of the lawsuit.
"They're doing everything they can so people can't vote on it," he said of Save Union County, which began circulating its own referendum petitions Thursday. "I think it's disingenuous of them to say they want people to vote on it but they do everything they can to keep people from voting on it."
SUC's claims
The lawsuit, as prepared by Save Union County's attorney, James Abourezk, lays out 12 grounds for the action. Among its claims are that the rezoning:
-- Violates the Union County Comprehensive Plan in that the new developments are not consistent with existing adjacent development, cities within the county were not consulted early.
-- Promotes the interests of individuals over those of the public.
-- Violates the Agricultural Protection Area requirements and agricultural preservation principals.
-- Violates the general requirement that the county discourage fragmentation of large parcels of ag land.
-- Fails to recognize that Hyperion's plans are not sufficient in scope and character to fulfill the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance.
-- Requires closing two township roads and one county road.
-- Cedes county authority to govern to Hyperion.
-- Was improperly passed in a changed form by the commissioners without following procedures for public hearings.
Download the lawsuit here.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in Union County Circuit Court, appeals the commissioners' decision to grant Hyperion's application to rezone 3,292 acres of land to accommodate the proposed $10 billion, 400,000-barrel-per-day refinery.
It alleges the commissioners "grossly violated" the law and the county's Comprehensive Plan on March 11 when they approved the ordinance to change the zoning on the refinery site from agricultural to a new class, Energy Center Planned Development District.
Ed Cable, spokesman for the Save Union County Committee, said in a statement, "The county government is acting as though citizens concerned about their actions were invisible, ignoring their protests, refusing to allow public comment and other dictatorial practices."
When informed he and his fellow commissioners had been sued, board Chairman Doyle Karpen{M3 said, "I thought they would have done it sooner. That's their right to do that. I guess they have to move forward with what they think is right."
Supporters file petitions
At nearly the same time the lawsuit was filed, Citizens for Hyperion, a pro-refinery group, filed petitions bearing 952 signatures to bring the zoning matter to a countywide referendum, 20 days ahead of the filing deadline.
"It's exactly double (the number of signatures) needed, and we're still counting," said J.B. Mercer, co-chairman of Citizens for Hyperion. He said a number of petitions are still being circulated.
Mercer said County Auditor Carol Klumper had file stamped all the petitions and has already begun verifying the signatures, hoping to complete that work by Monday. He said he wasn't surprised to learn of the lawsuit.
"They're doing everything they can so people can't vote on it," he said of Save Union County, which began circulating its own referendum petitions Thursday. "I think it's disingenuous of them to say they want people to vote on it but they do everything they can to keep people from voting on it."
SUC's claims
The lawsuit, as prepared by Save Union County's attorney, James Abourezk, lays out 12 grounds for the action. Among its claims are that the rezoning:
-- Violates the Union County Comprehensive Plan in that the new developments are not consistent with existing adjacent development, cities within the county were not consulted early.
-- Promotes the interests of individuals over those of the public.
-- Violates the Agricultural Protection Area requirements and agricultural preservation principals.
-- Violates the general requirement that the county discourage fragmentation of large parcels of ag land.
-- Fails to recognize that Hyperion's plans are not sufficient in scope and character to fulfill the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance.
-- Requires closing two township roads and one county road.
-- Cedes county authority to govern to Hyperion.
-- Was improperly passed in a changed form by the commissioners without following procedures for public hearings.
Download the lawsuit here.
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 12 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service















Theodore Curry wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:16 AM:
everyone is an expert wrote on Mar 24, 2008 2:46 PM:
"
oneofthepeople wrote on Mar 23, 2008 7:55 PM:
the diamond cutter wrote on Mar 22, 2008 9:09 AM:
Who? let the Lemmings Out? wrote on Mar 22, 2008 1:19 AM:
not SC or SSC. Many blue-collar jobs
will be taken by well qualified and trained persons.
Big Cat, We wouldn't need new roads or
schools until overrun by the masses.
Most likely the employees would stay
in South Dakota cause we have no pers
income tax. Many would move north,
Sioux Falls has much more to offer.
Dave, Sue Bush for lack of progress in
Iraq and not bringing the troops home
to their jobs.
PS: Whose paying for Citizens for Hyperion? Duh! "