County wants Hyperion suit dismissed
Commissioners say group sued using wrong law
By Michele Linck Journal staff writer | Posted: Tuesday, April 15, 2008
ELK POINT, S.D. -- The Union County Board of Commissioners claimed Monday that oil refinery opponents Ed Cable and his Save Union County Committee sued them using the wrong law and asked the Circuit Court judge to dismiss the case.
The county said in its response to the lawsuit that neither Cable nor Save Union County showed they had standing to sue under South Dakota law.
Cable declined to comment on the county's response Monday, saying it wouldn't be appropriate since he hadn't yet seen the county's filing in the case.
The lawsuit, filed March 20 in Circuit Court, seeks to overturn the new zoning county commissioners granted for Texas-based Hyperion Resources to build an oil refinery on 3,292 acres previously zoned for agriculture.
The county said state law provides for appeal "only by persons who have suffered individual and personal grievances." It said Save Union County's lawsuit makes no claim of personal grievance and instead says that the zoning decision "injures the public and is inconsistent with the county's comprehensive zoning plan."
To sharpen the point, the county's response notes that the group could have used a different law that it cites as "the exclusive method for pursuing a general taxpayer appeal."
The county's answer to the Cable/Save Union County appeal fills just a page. It refers to a legal brief in support of its claims but, according to Union County Clerk of Court Melissa Larsen, the brief is available only to the judge and is not filed with court documents.
A phone call seeking details about the brief from the Sioux Falls law firm that filed the motion to dismiss jointly with Union County State's Attorney Jerry Miller was not returned Monday.
The county said in its response to the lawsuit that neither Cable nor Save Union County showed they had standing to sue under South Dakota law.
Cable declined to comment on the county's response Monday, saying it wouldn't be appropriate since he hadn't yet seen the county's filing in the case.
The lawsuit, filed March 20 in Circuit Court, seeks to overturn the new zoning county commissioners granted for Texas-based Hyperion Resources to build an oil refinery on 3,292 acres previously zoned for agriculture.
The county said state law provides for appeal "only by persons who have suffered individual and personal grievances." It said Save Union County's lawsuit makes no claim of personal grievance and instead says that the zoning decision "injures the public and is inconsistent with the county's comprehensive zoning plan."
To sharpen the point, the county's response notes that the group could have used a different law that it cites as "the exclusive method for pursuing a general taxpayer appeal."
The county's answer to the Cable/Save Union County appeal fills just a page. It refers to a legal brief in support of its claims but, according to Union County Clerk of Court Melissa Larsen, the brief is available only to the judge and is not filed with court documents.
A phone call seeking details about the brief from the Sioux Falls law firm that filed the motion to dismiss jointly with Union County State's Attorney Jerry Miller was not returned Monday.
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 5 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service















the same big talkers... wrote on Apr 16, 2008 10:24 PM:
The real reason? wrote on Apr 16, 2008 10:20 PM:
diamondcutter wrote on Apr 16, 2008 8:31 PM:
Have had it! wrote on Apr 15, 2008 6:47 PM:
puppet show wrote on Apr 15, 2008 10:16 AM: