Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Jorgensen: New school chief's $190,000 pay justified

Sioux City district 'almost dead last' when it comes to benefits, he says

By Earl Horlyk Journal staff writer | Posted: Tuesday, April 29, 2008
SIOUX CITY -- Characterizing it as "consistent with a comparably sized district," Sioux City Community School Board president Ron Jorgensen on Monday night outlined the contract offered to incoming Superintendent Paul Gausman.

As part of the three-year deal beginning July 1, Gausman would receive:

-- A base annual salary of $190,000.

-- In lieu of reimbursement for use of his personal vehicle, a travel stipend of $500 a month

-- $775 a month to buy insurance, with increases corresponding to increases for other administrators under the district's plan.

-- Reimbursement for moving his family from their home in Hartford, S.D., to a home in Sioux City and up to $1,000 a month to rent a home for six months or until he closes on the sale of his current home, whichever is less.

-- A BlackBerry or comparable wireless phone and a laptop computer.

-- Up to $1,000 a year for dues to state and national professional associations.

The board is expected to vote to approve Gausman's contract at a special meeting at noon today.

Jorgensen admitted the $190,000 contract "was a shock to my system" but added the board "acted prudently" when it began its search to replace retiring Superintendent Larry Williams.

"When (the board) entered this process," he said, "we asked ourselves what we wanted in our next superintendent and what would be in the community's best interest."

"What we decided was in the best interest in the community," Jorgensen said, "was to entice the best possible candidate."

Looking at their peer school districts within the Urban Education Network, or UEN, the board noted that two slightly smaller school districts, Council Bluffs and Waterloo, were also looking for superintendents.

"Both of those districts advertised base salaries starting at $195,000," Jorgensen said. "Consultants that the board hired to help us with our search recommended that we advertise for nothing less than $190,000."

Steve Crary, the district's director of human resources, said the base salary was needed "to keep the district competitive and to attract a high caliber of individual."

The job, advertised nationally, statewide andlocally, attracted 15 candidates.

"That just goes to show how small a pool there is for superintendents," Crary added.

That pool was narrowed to six by consultants before being narrowed again to four by the board.

Of the four, Jorgensen said, "I think we have a great candidate in Gausman."

Noting Gausman's current salary of $91,320 as superintendent in Hartford, Jorgensen said the board never considered lowering its salary offer. "We would not engage in a game of bait and switch," he said. "That's no way to build a level of trust."

Jorgensen also said the public should not compare Gausman's contract with those of superintendents in other school districts.

"That would be like comparing apples with oranges," he said. "In terms of benefits, we'd rather compare apples to apples."

Jorgensen said while other school districts pay full health benefits, the Sioux City district pays for only half.

"Other districts pay toward a retirement plan," he said, "we do not. Also, other districts have been known to offer a signing fee for its new superintendent. We do not do that.

"In fact," Jorgensen continued, "in terms of benefits, we're almost dead last in the UEN."

"But," added Crary, "as a district, we're still competitive."

"I think the salary is very fair," said board member Nancy Mounts. "For a district our size, it's very fair."

Williams, whose salary at the end of the 2007-08 school year will be $150,000, agreed.

"I've always thought I've been compensated very well by the district," he said. "But I also knew what the salary range for a new superintendent would be."

Williams admitted that the salary "may be larger than what the community was bracing itself for," but he added the community would be in much worse shape "if the search had failed to find a suitable successor."

Board member Doug Batchellor said he believes Gausman will be such a successor.

"(Gausman) seems to be a person of quality," he said. "We were looking for a person who will be here as long as Larry, if not longer. If Gausman proves to be that man, I think this will be a bargain."

Previous
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

Amy of the Lakes wrote on May 4, 2008 10:55 AM:

" We moved to the Iowa Great Lakes area and my daughter is now scoring in the 98th percentile on the ITBS with no single score below the 97th! Take this the right way my friends when I say Come Jump in the Lakes! "

Amy of the Lakes wrote on May 4, 2008 10:53 AM:

" Honestly - I gave up on Sioux City years ago and it took me a few more years to actually get my family and me out of there. I used to love Sioux City. I grew up there. Now...it`s gone downhill, perhaps irredeemably. If the new sups job description could include accountability for turning test scores around, ending gang violence, raising academic standards, and streamlining expenses -- that would be worth it. "

lds wrote on Apr 29, 2008 9:06 PM:

" I agree with many of the comments posted. While the district does need to pay to get quality, it comes at a bad time financially for the district. Additionally, the district doesn't have the best image, either. It doesn't promote itself very well and this certainly adds to the pressure. I have a hard time understanding why the district can increase the salary so high while my child's teacher continues to pay for school supplies out of their own pocket. "

Taxpayer wrote on Apr 29, 2008 5:27 PM:

" I dont mind the high salaries of central administrators of the Sioux City Community School District, IF THE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IS ALSO HIGH, which it is not. The board and top central administrators say they want to make teachers more accountable. The principals and teachers are following central administrations lead and looking at this years (and the past several years) standardized test scores, central administration's strategies, or more likely, the execution of their strategies is not working. As reported in January by the Journal, the Assessment Director did not know why there was a large drop in this years test scores. This does not sound like the taxpayers are getting their monies worth from that analysis. The HR Director has to hire consultants to find a superintendent. Again, are the taxpayers getting their monies worth from these high paying positions of leadership? The HR Director added as a district, were still competitive. NOT WITH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT, which in this taxpayers mind is what it is all about. I dont mind paying higher property taxes, but I do want to see results in the form of higher student achievement. "

Jessica wrote on Apr 29, 2008 4:54 PM:

" For all of you complainers, if you had a bunch of education and experience under your belt maybe you'd be making more money than you do at Walmart... get over it. "

Read More and Post Comments 16 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
72°
Tue
84°/69°
Wed
83°/64°

Events Calendar

Other Publications