Culver vetoes union bill, executive pay raises
By Dan Gearino Journal Des Moines Bureau | Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008
DES MOINES -- Gov. Chet Culver said Wednesday he will veto an expansion of collective bargaining rights for public employee unions, a crushing blow to legislators and labor leaders who hoped he would sign the measure.
"It is not in the best interests of the taxpayers of Iowa to let this legislation become law," Culver said at a Statehouse news conference.
He also announced he will veto part of a budget bill that would have given pay raises to top elected officials, including the governor.
The collective bargaining veto puts Culver at odds with fellow Democrats, including the top leaders in the House and Senate. He also risks alienating organized labor, a key constituency for the party.
Democratic legislative leaders issued a joint statement saying they are "incredibly disappointed."
Linda Nelson, president of the Iowa State Education Association, the state's largest teachers' union, said she feels let down by Culver. "He missed a great opportunity to recognize educators as true professionals and full partners in educational decision making," she said in a statement.
Culver said the bill is deeply flawed.
"It is vaguely written, with the potential for far-reaching, unintended consequences that could obligate citizens of Iowa for substantial new public expenditures," he said.
The bill, Senate File 2645, would have expanded the scope of topics that can be part of contract negotiations for public-employee unions.
Unions could have insisted that the negotiations include items such as uniforms, class sizes or other conditions of employment. Under current law, public employers can insist that negotiations only cover salary or benefits.
Union officials said the bill would have been a minor change that has worked in the 27 other states where similar rules are in place.
Public employers -- such as school districts and city governments -- said the bill would have been a major change that would have led to big increases in labor costs.
A separate provision in the bill would have shortened the process for firing teachers. The provision says final decisions on firing would be made by an independent adjudicator. Under current law, an adjudicator's decision can be appealed to the court system. School administrators said the proposed system would make it more difficult to remove ineffective teachers because there would be fewer appeals.
Republican leaders applauded the veto.
"Culver standing up to his own party illustrates how truly awful this legislation was and how out of touch the House Democrats were with Iowans," said House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City.
Senate Minority Leader Ron Wieck, R-Sioux City, said the veto is good for just about everyone. "The true winners today are the Iowa taxpayers," he said.
The bill surfaced in late March when House Democrats added the most controversial elements to an otherwise non-controversial bill. Legislative Democrats hoped to pass the bill in the House in one day and pass it in the Senate the following day, but Republicans used stall tactics to draw the debate out for several more days.
On the day the bill passed the Senate, Culver issued a statement asking Senate Democrats to slow down so the public would have a chance to review the bill and comment on it. Senate Democrats dismissed his concerns and passed the bill a few hours later. Culver and legislative leaders met privately for weeks to try to come up with ways modify the bill. Then, in late-April, he issued a statement saying the talks were unproductive and he would sign or veto the bill in its current form.
He declined to comment about the process Wednesday, choosing instead to speak about the merits of the bill.
On the salary legislation, Culver said he didn't want to give himself a pay raise at a time of economic uncertainty.
"I believe it's wrong to say to the people of Iowa that you have to tighten your belts, while elected officials don't," he said.
The governor's annual salary would have risen from $130,000 to $142,570.
Four other top officials -- the lieutenant governor, auditor of state, secretary of state and treasurer of state -- would have gone from $103,212 each to $127,530 each. The attorney general would have gone from $123,926 to $137,330.
Culver is using his line-item veto power to delete the salaries from a larger budget bill. He said he will approve several other items in the bill, including changes to rules for certain local option sales taxes.
Under the new rules, local governments will be able to change the purpose of the tax without needing voter approval. The bill says the change can only be done if the tax is being shifted for use on urban renewal projects.
The provision has nothing to do with the school infrastructure local option sales tax, or SILO, which the Legislature converted into a statewide tax this year.
Dan Gearino can be reached at 515-243-0138 and dan.gearino@lee.net
"It is not in the best interests of the taxpayers of Iowa to let this legislation become law," Culver said at a Statehouse news conference.
He also announced he will veto part of a budget bill that would have given pay raises to top elected officials, including the governor.
The collective bargaining veto puts Culver at odds with fellow Democrats, including the top leaders in the House and Senate. He also risks alienating organized labor, a key constituency for the party.
Democratic legislative leaders issued a joint statement saying they are "incredibly disappointed."
Linda Nelson, president of the Iowa State Education Association, the state's largest teachers' union, said she feels let down by Culver. "He missed a great opportunity to recognize educators as true professionals and full partners in educational decision making," she said in a statement.
Culver said the bill is deeply flawed.
"It is vaguely written, with the potential for far-reaching, unintended consequences that could obligate citizens of Iowa for substantial new public expenditures," he said.
The bill, Senate File 2645, would have expanded the scope of topics that can be part of contract negotiations for public-employee unions.
Unions could have insisted that the negotiations include items such as uniforms, class sizes or other conditions of employment. Under current law, public employers can insist that negotiations only cover salary or benefits.
Union officials said the bill would have been a minor change that has worked in the 27 other states where similar rules are in place.
Public employers -- such as school districts and city governments -- said the bill would have been a major change that would have led to big increases in labor costs.
A separate provision in the bill would have shortened the process for firing teachers. The provision says final decisions on firing would be made by an independent adjudicator. Under current law, an adjudicator's decision can be appealed to the court system. School administrators said the proposed system would make it more difficult to remove ineffective teachers because there would be fewer appeals.
Republican leaders applauded the veto.
"Culver standing up to his own party illustrates how truly awful this legislation was and how out of touch the House Democrats were with Iowans," said House Minority Leader Christopher Rants, R-Sioux City.
Senate Minority Leader Ron Wieck, R-Sioux City, said the veto is good for just about everyone. "The true winners today are the Iowa taxpayers," he said.
The bill surfaced in late March when House Democrats added the most controversial elements to an otherwise non-controversial bill. Legislative Democrats hoped to pass the bill in the House in one day and pass it in the Senate the following day, but Republicans used stall tactics to draw the debate out for several more days.
On the day the bill passed the Senate, Culver issued a statement asking Senate Democrats to slow down so the public would have a chance to review the bill and comment on it. Senate Democrats dismissed his concerns and passed the bill a few hours later. Culver and legislative leaders met privately for weeks to try to come up with ways modify the bill. Then, in late-April, he issued a statement saying the talks were unproductive and he would sign or veto the bill in its current form.
He declined to comment about the process Wednesday, choosing instead to speak about the merits of the bill.
On the salary legislation, Culver said he didn't want to give himself a pay raise at a time of economic uncertainty.
"I believe it's wrong to say to the people of Iowa that you have to tighten your belts, while elected officials don't," he said.
The governor's annual salary would have risen from $130,000 to $142,570.
Four other top officials -- the lieutenant governor, auditor of state, secretary of state and treasurer of state -- would have gone from $103,212 each to $127,530 each. The attorney general would have gone from $123,926 to $137,330.
Culver is using his line-item veto power to delete the salaries from a larger budget bill. He said he will approve several other items in the bill, including changes to rules for certain local option sales taxes.
Under the new rules, local governments will be able to change the purpose of the tax without needing voter approval. The bill says the change can only be done if the tax is being shifted for use on urban renewal projects.
The provision has nothing to do with the school infrastructure local option sales tax, or SILO, which the Legislature converted into a statewide tax this year.
Dan Gearino can be reached at 515-243-0138 and dan.gearino@lee.net
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 3 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service
Analyst wrote on May 16, 2008 2:11 AM:
Scott wrote on May 15, 2008 9:19 PM:
ER wrote on May 15, 2008 8:46 AM: