Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

EPA decision sets precedent

Posted: Friday, August 08, 2008
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) -- The Environmental Protection Agency's decision to uphold a renewable fuels standard sets an important precedent, the executive director of the American Coalition for Ethanol said.

"Ethanol's benefits to fuel prices far outweigh any food-related price increases from ethanol," said Brian Jennings, of the American Coalition for Ethanol in Sioux Falls.

"We need it (renewable fuels standard) because with oil at $120 a barrel we still need cost effective and clean-burning alternatives at the pump."

A federal energy bill passed late in 2007 requires that 9 billion gallons of ethanol be blended into gasoline. Texas Gov. Rick Perry had asked the EPA to drop the requirement to 4.5 billion gallons because he said demand for ethanol is driving up corn prices for livestock producers and driving up food prices.

Without alternative fuels, oil refineries would have to increase their production of gasoline to offset the loss of ethanol, according to the South Dakota Corn Growers Association.

Ethanol production is responsible for only a small portion of higher food prices, said Bill Chase, the group's president.

"By extending fuel supplies, ethanol actually reduces fuel costs significantly," Chase said.

The state's congressional delegation hailed the EPA decision.

"Granting this waiver would have increased gas prices for consumers, discouraged the development of biofuels, and jeopardized the future of cellulosic biorefineries that have already been built or are in the planning or construction stages around the nation," said Republican Sen. John Thune.

"In 2007, we made strong improvements to our energy policy to reduce our dependence on foreign oil," said Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson. "Today's decision by the EPA administrator is a strong step toward implementing better energy policy that will benefit consumers today and in the coming years."

"Given that biofuels are helping make America more energy independent and that studies show biofuels are helping to keep gas prices lower than they otherwise would be, it's clear that our commitment to renewable fuels must not waver," said Democratic Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin.

Previous
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

Bobby Fontaine wrote on Aug 8, 2008 9:48 AM:

" From 22 to 18 mpg, youre experiencing over an 18% loss of mpg adding 10% ethanol to gasoline It means the ethanol isnt combusting and coming out your tailpipe while causing your gasoline to fail giving 8% less mpg than it otherwise would. So if there was no ethanol in the gasoline but you filled your tank with 10% less fuel, you would be getting 8% more mpg than you are now. And your problem is not particular to you. Its the same complaint Ive seen consistently since ethanol started to be used. Many people who dont watch their mileage also complain about mileage loss. The 3 percent the government says would not be noticeable. 10% or more is noticeable without measuring. Ethanol is a total waste, that is anhydrous ethanol which was designed as an oxygenate, not a fuel. Hydrous ethanol reformulated to add gasoline is much easier to produce, doesn't pollute, and causes no MPG loss. China, Europe, and Louisiana are using it. ProblemPolitics/Lies-Washington-Bush/Cheney -MTBE/EPA Enron "

Adam wrote on Aug 8, 2008 9:39 AM:

" Jennings is totally right: the EPA made the right decision. Now that we've made this step toward energy independence, it would be absurd to take a step back by reducing ethanol requirements. I've worked a bit with the Renewable Fuels Association, and their studies show that current ethanol levels in our fuels save the average household up to $300 a year on gasoline. We need to do more with ethanol, not less. "

Read More and Post Comments 2 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
72°
Tue
84°/69°
Wed
83°/64°

Events Calendar

Other Publications