Former teachers should not sit on school board
Posted: Friday, September 05, 2008
SIOUX CITY -- I received a post card in the mail stating that I should vote for Jackie Warnstadt for school board because of her 44 years of experience as a teacher. Mrs. Warnstadt may be a very nice person and I am aware that she had won a Teacher of the Year Award, but being a teacher for 44 years does not qualify a person for the school board any more than working on an assembly line qualifies a person to be CEO of General Motors.
Do you want the National Education Association administering your school system? I don't. I believe the NEA is one of the reasons our school system is failing the children of our great country.
I have nothing against Mrs, Warnstadt, I just feel that no former teacher should be allowed to sit on the school board. Besides the obvious conflicts of interest these union members will have, simply being a teacher in no way qualifies you to sit on the board of a multi-million-dollar enterprise. -- Mark Solheim
Do you want the National Education Association administering your school system? I don't. I believe the NEA is one of the reasons our school system is failing the children of our great country.
I have nothing against Mrs, Warnstadt, I just feel that no former teacher should be allowed to sit on the school board. Besides the obvious conflicts of interest these union members will have, simply being a teacher in no way qualifies you to sit on the board of a multi-million-dollar enterprise. -- Mark Solheim
Story Comments
Read More and Post Comments 37 comment(s)
Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service
















Diogenes wrote on Sep 11, 2008 11:19 AM:
A democracy is a form of government--over 200 years ago, educated people would have said that there were three forms of government: monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy. (See Samuel Johnsons dictionary.) The word "republic" does not refer to a type of government, but to a description of a state. Two hundred years ago, "republick" would have been defined as a state in which power is lodged in more than one. (Johnson again.)
When Paul wrote: "Democracy and republic are both words that describe our type of government," he was correct. "
Paul wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:38 AM:
Steve wrote on Sep 10, 2008 6:02 PM:
Paul wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:43 AM:
Steve wrote on Sep 9, 2008 6:45 PM:
"... The United States of America has moved away from its republican roots and become more "democratic," ...
Paul, please point out which Constitutional Ammendments changed our Republic into a democracy. "