Post A Comment
Email
Print
Type Size:
Small
Large

Woman seeks limits on mentally disabled voters

Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2008
GRINNELL, Iowa (AP) -- A Deep River woman wants to change a state law to require that mentally disabled voters be supervised when they cast a ballot.

Brenda Lyddon said she was upset when staff at a group home in Grinnell took her 26-year-old son, who is developmentally disabled, to vote on Election Day against her wishes.

Lyddon said she's not trying to take away a person's right to vote.

"It's just that a lot of us, (group) homes and parents, need to work together and agree on what's best for our loved ones," she told The Gazette in Cedar Rapids.

Lyddon said she told the person in charge of the group home that her son was not to vote.

"I am his mother and he was not allowed to vote," Lyddon said.

Lyddon, who has guardianship over most of her son's legal decision, unsuccessfully challenged his ballot.

Lyddon supported Republican John McCain and her son voted for Democrat Barack Obama, but Lyddon said that's why she challenged her son's ballot.

"He does not have the mental capacity to choose for himself," she said.

It was at least the second case in which a relative challenged a family member's ballot in this month's presidential election in Iowa.

In Council Bluffs, a woman challenged her elderly mother's absentee ballot, claiming her mother suffered from dementia and was coerced into casting the ballot by Democratic campaign workers who were going door-to-door asking potential voters if they wanted an absentee ballot.

In that case, the woman supported McCain and her mother reportedly voted for Obama.

That challenge was also unsuccessful.

Linda Langenberg, deputy Iowa secretary of state, said it's the first time in her 32 years supervising elections that she's heard of someone challenging a family member's ballot. Langenberg was auditor in Linn County for 30 years before moving to the secretary of state's office two years ago.

Langenberg said it's not easy to take away someone's right to vote.

"The Iowa code says the only way you can deny them their right to vote is to have them judged incompetent by a court of law," said Langenberg, who oversees election and voter registration.

She said nothing improper was found in the Council Bluffs case, and in the Poweshiek County case the individual in question knew who he wanted to vote for.

"Do you take away that vote because in your mind they don't have the mental capacity? But maybe they do," Langenberg said.

"So who makes that judgment?" Langenberg asked. "It is a very sensitive area. There are definitely cases where people appear to be incompetent but they haven't been judged incompetent by a court and until a judge says that we can't make that judgment."

Previous
Post A Comment
Email
Print

Story Comments

Mark wrote on Nov 19, 2008 8:58 AM:

" I'm all for everyone who is able to vote doing so. However, while going door-to-door for my party's candidates prior to the election I discovered at least two instances where family members reported someone was in a nursing home with Alzheimers and they were on my list of people who had successfully requested and received absentee ballots. Apparently someone in administration at the nursing home was helping them request the ballots and presumably helping fill them out and sending them back in. Regardless of your party affiliation, this should concern us all. Someone needs to check into this as voter fraud does nothing to help the election and only adds to the general feeling that elections can be fixed and "one person one vote" isn't necessarily true. I personally feel anyone caught doing this should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and be made an example of. Take notice, those of you in Le Mars who perpetrated this voter fraud: You didn't get away with this and there WILL be a price to pay. "

Lee wrote on Nov 19, 2008 8:22 AM:

" Jules is right. Perhaps the Republicans will just have to get as adept as fooling and harassing the mentally challenged into voting for them as the Democrats are. "

Jules wrote on Nov 19, 2008 6:52 AM:

" Don't mess with who gets to vote and who doesn't as once that starts its only a matter of time before a certain few will be voting. As US Citizens they have the right to vote no matter who took them. Let the disabled vote for who they want. I figure a candidate that doesn't bicker is better suited to run things. Guardianship has nothing to do with how a person votes. I think this is a case where the guardian is upset that the disabled person didn't vote the way she wanted him to. Don't stop the developmentally disabled, mentally disabled or the mentally ill from voting. Its a right each US citizen has. Most people know that candidates can't keep promises but makes them hoping to look better to vote for. Anyone ever here of majority counts that is what it is and the president, governor can veto what the majority vote is. So don't take away any more of the rights from the disabled inviduals than there already is as to do this will only lead to more rights taken away and not from just disabled individuals, but from everyone. "

Read More and Post Comments 3 comment(s)

Please note: The following are comments from readers. In no way do they represent the views of The Sioux City Journal or Lee Enterprises. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to not post or to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain potentially libelous statements; obscene, explicit or racist language; personal attacks, insults or threats. Terms of Service

Sponsored by

Weather

Currently
77°
Sat
82°/61°
Sun
86°/62°

Events Calendar

Other Publications